Category Archives: Online Learning

Twelve Strategies to Promote Online Growth While Ensuring Quality

Blogging the Online Learning Consortium International Conference 2014

Presenters: Brian Udermann (University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, USA)Cristi Ford (University of the District of Columbia, USA)

Juggling concept: the more things you add for your online learning program, the more likely is that a ball will drop. It’s ok. Pick it up and keep moving forward.

Interesting Notes

  • 25 % of faculty think their institution are pushing online education too much (not the 85% we might think).
  • At the beginning they asked everyone to stand up, and then sit down if you don’t have this in place: one person who oversees online education; have an online advisory board; have an instructional designer; have policies and procedures.

Strategies and Audience Ideas

  1. Have one person who oversees online education for your campus. Don’t add it to someone else’s load as an add on to their other responsibilities. Include things like proctoring, policies, tutoring online, student services, support services – available for ALL online programs.
  2. Have an Online Advisory Board. Should include Faculty, students, administrators, business services, program directors, instructional designers, student support services.
  3. Offer high quality faculty development opportunities. Ideas include: Online learning competency assessment (for people who say they’ve taught online); Online learning academy (6 weeks in the summer for 3 days a week – for those who are totally new); OLC workshops; during the school year accelerated online learning academy; elearning scholars institute – OLC workshops for faculty who want to dabble in online learning. And then after they take the workshop, they teach it to other faculty at a brown bag lunch. Weekly sessions. Use tips and tools to get them in the door, and then teach them something about pedagogy.
  4. Create faculty buy-in. Consider what motivates and demotivates faculty. Student need is a very high motivator. A national credential for training. Something that recognizes faculty at graduation – like a stole to wear. Competencies are important.
  5. Hire an instructional designer. Best way to increase the quality of online learning at your institution. Create an online education factbook for your institution. Impact of online courses on the graduation rate. Impact of instructional designer on retention rate. Partner your ID with your “grumpy guy” to sell resistance faculty on online learning. Two models: they are a consultant and training or are they actually building and designing the course? Interesting thought: the ID on the higher ed side is similar to a media specialist on the K12 side. 
  6. Create a policies and procedures manual or handbook for online education. i.e. what are the policies: do we pay more for online courses? can I start my online course a week early? when do I give the final exam in my online course? can I teach my course through my personal blog? student evaluations of instructors, i.e. enrollment in online shouldn’t exceed face to face, dropping online courses, workload, response time, policy for changing instructors in the middle of the term, credit hour. Example of the online handbook at UWLAX. You might need a document with policies and a document with best practices. University approved policies, faculty expectations, best practices etc.
  7. Have a course review process in place. Examples: Quality Matters, Penn State Quality Standards, Lone Star College, Community of Inquiry, Quality Assurance Model Florida State.
  8. Provide financial support for training and course / program development. Give certificates, buy stoles, give incentives.
  9. Ensure high quality student support services for online learners. Library, student ID, assessment, communication, student communities, personal services, etc.
  10. Create a strategic road map for your institution. For example, who is responsible for these different issues and getting them done. How will you get there. Think logistically about what it takes.
  11. Collect and use data. Number of online courses, gen ed online courses, students taking online courses, graduation rate in six years if they took online course. Tell faculty about it – those who teach online, those who don’t. Share share.
  12. Dare to be different.

Things To Work On

  • An online program policies and procedures manual. This is ours and this is Brian’s. Improvements could be made on ours!
  • Have a workshop on ways to reduce cheating (same level of cheating for online and f2f)
  • Build more faculty training options
  • Intellectual property clarity. For example one option might be: university has a non-exclusive in perpetuity license for the content; and if the university funds creation of media, the university owns that media.

Bonus: Brian is an excellent example of how to interject humor into your teaching.

Leveraging the Investment in Online Education: A Workshop for Campus Leaders

Blogging the Online Learning Consortium International Conference 2014

Presenters: Mary Niemic, Dylan Barth, and Laura Pedrick

Interesting Notes

Investment
[Photo credit: LendingMemo.com]
New term: Nanodegrees. In the context of the different types of online learning – MOOCs, self-paced, competency based, credit, certificates, degrees, modules, etc.

Report: Online College Students 2014 (from LearningHouse). Reputation, price, credit transferability, and job credibility are important to students. Within 8 weeks of application, students want to be able to start their degree.

Support for Learning: The idea of integrating offices for learning technologies and professional development to one unit that supports all good teaching – online, blended, on campus. Active learning, blended learning, educational technologies, etc.

Resource: Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; UW Milwaukee is building a national database of research on online learning; with grants for others to participate in the research.

University of Nebraska High School – has existed since 1929 (kind of like Andrews University‘s Griggs International Academy that started in 1909). Only 11% of the enrollment in this HS are in Nebraska.

Critical success factors: mission and goals; goals aligned to specific metrics; sustainable resource management strategy, administrative structure, policies, systems, effective communication, comprehensive evaluation plan that drives future efforts.

Favorite quote: It’s not the flashiest thing that determines quality, it’s the thing that helps students learn the best; and the method of allowing for faculty presence.

Interesting Discussions

  • Choices
    Photo Credit: Akuppa John Wigham

    Enrollment Data. Do you count online learning in the fall with a census date, or do you count the full year? How to discuss counting with the rest of campus that is counting in the fall where it makes sense. But online students and coming and going all year long.

  • Honors. Who has honors options for online students? Most everyone in the room doesn’t – discussion of how all students have the right to access to honors programs; but there may be significant resistance on campus to offering honors options online.
  • Educational models that are changing – flipped, blended, competency, self-paced, shrinking semesters, synchronous or asynchronous. What are the benefits and challenges for each and which to choose for the degree? How to work with faculty who start with the idea that we just need to stream what is happening in the classroom? The online student doesn’t want the class on Tuesday at 2:30 pm; but how to assist faculty to realize students want to time-shift, and that is why they have chosen online learning. There isn’t really a huge market for synchronous learning.
  • Misunderstandings about what teaching is; what online learning is. The idea of “shrink-wrapping” a course by recording it and sending it to the student, with no other teaching included. A faculty member who wanted to be recorded so that when he died, his course could still be taught and his family could get the income. Misunderstandings about where the “teaching” happens in online learning, or even in f2f classes.
  • Revenue. Planning to do online learning just for the revenue tends to fail. Funding models: 5% of tuition to the central support of distance. Or 10% of the distance fees. Seed funding for new programs; and tuition/fee distribution to encourage continuity of offerings. Centralized vs decentralized, and how the funding models follow that. What the costs are for U Nebraska.
  • Traditional students. Traditional students who take online courses have a faster time to complete their degree; they are taking online courses to supplement during clinicals and practicums. Traditional students are interested in supplementing their on campus experience with online. Resources created to support online students can end up supporting the on campus as well – i.e. one stop shopping for all your university needs and records, etc. Lots of swirling among institutions and even between online and on campus enrollment.
  • Change. Supporting online learning can create additional capacity in the university for change. Course redesign, support services adjustments, all have benefits for the university as a whole for dealing with change and becoming more flexible.
  • Systems. For universities part of a system, do you have competing programs? or not? Using funding and marketing as carrot/stick to keep universities in the same system from offering competing programs. Using market research to determine what the students are interested in? Restricting online competition vs. allowing competition within the system face to face. System thinking – you aren’t stealing each other’s students, the community colleges are stealing your students.
  • Summer. High demand courses, high interest, finish in four, online courses for the summer.
  • Market saturation. The market is getting saturated for online learning – and it’s important to think about the market and what is already out there. The MBA is the most saturated online degree.
  • Definitions. What is blended? what about percentages? Recommendation to review UWM’s definition.
  • MOOCs. What are they good for? Brand recognition, fodder for research projects, service to the global community.

Interesting Companies and Resources

  • NetTutor for outsourcing or supplementing tutoring
  • LTI intergrations – there may be legal issues depending on the student data you are sending to the LTI integration sites
  • OER resources – contributing, using, participating
  • MapWorks – early intervention and student success
  • U of Texas Productivity Dashboard – how are students of various degrees doing after they graduate? what are the trends for employment?
  • LibGuides – libraries using a libguide to support the learning, courses, and programs
  • Toggl – a tool for time tracking to work on faculty work load issues

Good Ideas to Apply

  • Online orientations; including for on campus students who missed the on campus orientation
  • A short certificate for online and blended teaching, and then create a community of those participating. The course is evaluated the first time it’s taught online or blended, and then the faculty member receives a certificate.
  • Accountability metrics: target demographics, capacity , growth, graduate job placement, not too many metrics. Consistent follow through on reporting the metrics. Need to think more about our metrics & goals in the various areas. Is it possible to do across the university or only by program and degree? Use this to manage expectations – have a metric that is challenging and achievable.
  • Have a librarian dedicated to OER
  • Have a librarian dedicated to distance education
  • Have a librarian create a LibGuide for each online course (or maybe program)
  • Create a guide for department chairs on developing an Online or Blended program
  • Online Program Council – or peer groups for program-level peer-to-peer best practice sharing
  • Evaluation plan: course surveys, designing surveys at the course level, evaluation of support systems, data consistency across programs, continuous assessment; system/campus wide, monitoring what you have built

Final advice

  • Keep the principles forefront – why are we doing it? it’s really about the students – access and flexibility – we are trying to do what is in the best interest of the students

Essentials: Structure and Routine in Online Courses

Note: This article was originally published in the Journal of Adventist Education, Distance Education Issue, April/May 2003. I’m reposting it here to give it a new home.

 

Essentials: Structure and Routine in Online Courses
By Janine Lim (p. 16)

Recent studies indicate the importance of consistency and structure for students learning online. Data obtained from surveys of students enrolled in asynchronous (completely online) courses offered by the State University of New York indicate that three factors “contribute significantly to the success of asynchronous online courses. These factors are a course structure that is both clear and consistent, an instructor that interacts frequently and productively with students, and a constructive and dynamic discussion between students and their peers.” [1]

In addition, researchers at the University of British Columbia who evaluated 127 courses offered online “have concluded that appearance and structure can make or break an online course.” [2] Why is structure so important? Higher levels of thinking are impossible in chaotic online courses. Structure is key!

Since 1999, alone or with a team, I have designed six online courses that are available for graduate credit from various universities. The course titles are: “Internet in the Classroom,” [3] “WebQuests,” which was chosen as an exemplary course in a WebCT 2000 study, [4] “Technology Tools for Literacy,” [5] “Active Online Teaching,” [6] “Integrating Technology in the Curriculum,” [7] and “Technology in the Early Elementary Classroom.” [8] All of the classes have been offered at least twice. Because of this experience, I’ve gained an understanding of the importance of routine and structure in online courses.

Given the importance of structure in an online course, we will examine two areas in this article: (1) creating a familiar structure by comparing standard components of face-to-face classes with online classes, and (2) creating course routine by using a consistent template for each module.

Creating a Familiar Structure
Most traditional classrooms are structured in fairly similar ways. Students know where to enter (the door), when to come and go (the class schedule), and how the room is defined (the walls). Students know where to sit (desks and other furniture), where the teacher will be (front, at a desk), which direction to face (arrangement of chairs), and where to look for information they need to copy (chalk board, white board, etc.). These familiar structures are consistent in classrooms around the world.

Many classroom learning experiences also have a familiar structure. The student knows that the class will include reading (a textbook and handouts), listening (lecture or classroom discussion), writing (homework assignments and notes), talking (asking questions, peer discussion, etc.), and evaluation (quizzes and exams).

An online class challenges assumptions about how learning takes place. The student must learn to negotiate the unfamiliar processes of a virtual classroom. Likewise, the teacher must deal with a variety of unfamiliar issues relating to the learning environment—the walls, desks, and chairs of the virtual classroom. Routine and structure provide a safety net and a sense of security for students, letting them know what to expect. Creating a safe learning environment is part of the AVLN standard for integrating faith and learning. Students learn better in a safe and consistent environment. For example, note these student comments from the second week of “Technology in the Early Elementary Classroom” course in the spring of 2002:

  • After the first week, things are easier. I like that the format will stay the same.
  • The organization followed week one and is very easy to follow.
  • Organization is great! I recently had some computer training that was so unorganized it felt like a big waste of time. We spent all of our time getting ready to learn, finding what we needed and then evaluating. Barely any actual learning took place. This course is the exact opposite. [9]

The “Door”
The most intimidating part of an online class may be simply getting enrolled. Instructions (listed both in the syllabus and online) should indicate what skills are necessary to complete the course, as well as the equipment required for class projects. To help students enter the class means dealing with their individual needs. The instructor must provide access to appropriate support services and learning materials.
To assist students, create a window of time when they should first access the course. During this time, check E-mail, phone messages, and mail as often as possible, If your institution has a help desk, tell students when and how to access it. If possible, mail (not E-mail) instructions for getting into the class. Call students on the telephone if they haven’t logged in by the first or second day of the course. Be helpful and patient. Communicate the technical requirements and prerequisites early, so students know whether they have the technical expertise to take the course.

Time of Class
In a face-to-face course, students know when the class begins and ends. The time frame is clearly defined and regular. As you design your virtual classroom, be sure to define the time frame for your students, as well. When are they expected to log in? Do they need to log in a certain number of times a day? A week? How do they provide evidence that they are in class (posting in the discussion area, submitting assignments, reading pages, completing quizzes)?

Be very clear about your expectations. Communicate them in several places (in materials mailed to students, in the syllabus, in the online instructions, etc.). Do students know when they have to turn in assignments? Making these due at a regular time each week helps them get into a routine. Some classes use Sunday night as a weekly deadline. This allows students to use the weekend to finish any incomplete work.

The “Walls”
In a face-to-face class, the four walls of the classroom create a boundary and a feeling of security for students. They learn to trust one another when they realize that only the participants and instructor(s) of the course are listening to their ideas and opinions. In the virtual classroom, the instructor must create a comfortable space for students to share and learn. Most courseware, such as Blackboard and WebCT, provide a secure password-protected method for students to access and “enter” the classroom. Be sure to plan for introductions and other activities that help students get to know and trust one another.

We hear a lot these days about “moving beyond the four walls of the classroom.” In traditional education, this means enrichment experiences using Internet resources, access to experts via E-mail and video conferencing, or other types of creative learning outside the boundaries of the school room. The same can be true in an online course. Many online classes provide links to many resources and Web sites with supplemental material. Since it is difficult to tell how long students spend on various tasks, be careful not to overload them with extra material. Indicate clearly which resources are required reading and which are optional. For example, in the course “Technology in the Early Elementary Classroom,” the “See It” section provides 40 to 60 examples of technology integration for each core subject, such as reading or science. Participants are encouraged to choose the ideas that fit their needs and teaching style.

Within a course, there may be defining walls as well. Some courses divide students into small groups for various learning activities. These walls can be permeable, allowing students to move into other discussion areas and learn from people who are not in their group.

However you define the walls in your online course, keep in mind the needs of your students and provide the necessary support for them to access the resources and experiences of your course.

Dissemination of Content—The “Furniture”
In a traditional classroom, the student enters, sits down at a desk, and listens to the instructor for the majority of the session. Usually, this is when the teacher integrates faith and learning and encourages higher levels of thinking.

As you design your course, consider where students will “sit” to learn. How do they “listen” to you? How will they get the majority of their instruction? Do they need to do most of reading online? Can they print the materials? Do they know they need a fast printer? Do they know you are using multimedia/audio/video? Do they have the necessary software so they can listen to video clips? If not, who will help them install it? Plan to use a simple and consistent instructional structure so that all students will be able to participate.

In my online classes, I have chosen to create the instruction as Web pages. This allows me to control the dissemination of information. I prefer this method because many of my students do not have fast Internet connections and are unable to view fancy multimedia. I also like to have my instruction in a form that is portable from one courseware platform to another (i.e., Blackboard or WebCT). Courseware changes often; I would rather not redo my work each time I teach in a new medium. Web pages are easy to access and print, and they can be created to load quickly. They allow me to guide students through selected resources and links without overwhelming them with information.

Whether you use multimedia, Web pages, or another format, be sure to create a space for instruction that is regular and consistent. This helps students stay on track with the required work. Decide on the “icons” students are to click on to access various areas of the course. Keep these to a minimum to ensure simplicity and ease of use. Think about what students are to accomplish in those areas. Provide documentation that explains the various parts of the course. Later in this article, we will examine ways of making instruction regular and consistent.

Classroom Discussion
The AVLN teaching standards require that online courses address the relational basis of learning. [10] This includes interaction between all of the following: (1) learner and content; (2) learner and learner; (3) learner and teacher; (4) learner and self (reflection); and (4) learner and community (including service). The asynchronous discussion tool in your course can address most types of interaction.

To make your course interaction consistent and constructive, require substantive postings from each student/group during each week or module. Decide how to assess the discussion, and communicate your expectations clearly. Most students aren’t used to being graded on class participation. If they aren’t participating (especially in the first week or two), check up on them by E-mail or phone to make sure they understand that they must post their comments in the discussion area.

In many online classes, students tend to view the discussion area as a place to debate argumentatively, to upload summaries of articles, or to post lengthy opinions. Rarely does the discussion reach the level of dialogue, “a living experience of inquiry within and between people.” [11] Dialogue is “about evoking insight, which is a way of reordering our knowledge-particularly the taken-for-granted assumptions that people bring to the table.” [12] Help students learn to engage in meaningful dialogue with their peers. Some useful strategies for encouraging dialogue can be found at http://www.avln.org/learning/aot/dialogue.htm [link dead].

Monitor the discussion area frequently. Delete offensive posts, and communicate your expectations to the authors of abusive or inappropriate messages. With a little practice, you will find the discussion in your class blossoming. Your students will enjoy your class more because they feel connected to one another, the content, and their instructor.

Homework
In reality, everything in an online course is “homework.” Because of this, you need to find ways to keep students from spending extended periods staring at the computer screen. Create assignments that they can do offline and then report on. Encourage them to print out reading materials rather than reading them off the screen.

For assignments that won’t really enhance the learning of others, have students submit materials directly to the instructor. For assignments that share learning and construct knowledge about the topic, have them post in the discussion area. Pick one or two methods for students to use for submissions and stick with them throughout the course. Students shouldn’t have to learn to do new things or master new software for each assignment unless using software is part of the content for the course. Using technology in the online course already requires extra effort. Make things as simple and easy for your students as possible.

Course Routine and Consistent Templates
Now that we have examined ways to provide for the door, the walls, and the furniture of the virtual classroom, let’s take a closer look at how to create routine. This can be accomplished by incorporating a consistent template for the weeks or modules in the course. Let’s tour four online courses and examine the templates. [13]

“Developing WebQuests”
In this class, participants learn what a WebQuest [14] is and then create one in teams. Each week, the course has two new pages on the Web: (1) introduction and (2) instruction. The introduction page includes a quote, a graphic, the objectives, the assignments, and a note on time management. The instruction page includes links to readings and instructions for creating the portion of the WebQuest due that week. (This section of the course addresses the faith and learning standard and focuses on the thinking processes.) Discussion centers on chapters in the required textbook and the process of creating a WebQuest. Weekly discussions address the relational basis of learning standard and encourage higher-level thinking. The creation of a WebQuest meets the learning experience standard, and the assessment in the course was authentic, based on the completion and quality of the WebQuest created.

    21webquest

“Active Online Teaching”
In this course, the template is very simple. Each page contains a quote (generally taken from the Bible or Ellen G.White’s writings), a picture, and three components: Readings and Links, Discussion Starters, and Experiences. Students respond to both the readings and the experiences in the discussion area.

21aot

“Integrating Technology Into the Curriculum”
In this course, teachers develop instructional units that integrate technology into the curriculum. Experiences and examples modeling the integration of technology are included.

The template for this course includes six components:

  • Readings and Discussion (faith, thinking, and relational standards);
  • Experience (shown below)—a project created from the student’s point of view (experience and support standards);
  • Examples—includes lesson plans, sample assessment tools, and more (this allows for the individuality of learners—they can choose what applies to their situation);
  • Application—a culminating activity for the module, such as a lesson plan, a presentation for the school board, or an assessment plan (assessment and experience standards);
  • Assessment—information about the number of points possible and criteria used to evaluate participation for that week (assessment standard);
  • Evaluation—participants evaluate the course (assessment standard).

21itc2

“Technology in the Early Elementary Classroom”
This course takes an in-depth look at ways to integrate technology in core subject areas (reading, writing, math, science, and social studies). The course homepage was designed to be a warm, inviting space, using primary colors.

21teec

Each component is linked from the first page and has its own separate page. The template includes

  • A short paragraph introducing the module;
  • A quote related to the module;
  • Read It: required and optional readings on that week’s topic;
  • Talk It: discussion questions for the week;
  • See It: 40 to 60 technology integration ideas and examples for that subject;
  • Do It: choices for creating a student project example using KidPix or a digital camera. Projects are posted in the discussion area for peer review;
  • Manage It: classroom management tips for a technology-rich classroom;
  • Software Feature: exemplary software packages in that subject area;
  • Web Share: two or three “must see” Web sites.

Components to Choose
When creating a template for your online course, choose a few components to include in each module. Here are some possibilities to get you started:

Readings Assessment Application
Discussion Quizzes Papers
Journal Tests Portfolio
Experiments Activities Projects
Simulation Group work Problems
Modeling Research (library or Web) Lectures
Examples Case studies Lecture notes
Student-created questions    


As you create your course, keep in mind the AVLN standards for online teaching. [15] Be sure to plan ways to integrate faith and learning, both in the curriculum, “cyber chapel” or class devotions, and in your interactions with students. Encourage human interaction and relationships in your course, while providing stimulating learning experiences and appropriate assessment.

With some careful thought and design, you can create a virtual classroom with structure and routine—and one that addresses the AVLN standards. Your students will feel comfortable in the safe learning environment you have created and will have a rewarding learning experience.
_________________________
Janine Lim is an Instructional Technology Consultant at the Berrien County Intermediate School District in Berrien Springs, Michigan. She is an active Adventist Virtual Learning Network (AVLN) board member and chair of the AVLN Course Committee. She also teaches online regularly for AVLN, the Berrien County ISD, and the ATA Technology Academy, a Michigan grant project.

___________________________________________
NOTES AND REFERENCES

1. Karen Swan, “Virtual Interaction: Design Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning in Asynchronous Online Courses,” Distance Education 22:2 (2001), pp. 306-331.
2. Kelly McCollum, “Researchers Pick Best and Worst Web Courses,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 44 (February 27, 1998), p. A29.
3. Offered through Berrien County Intermediate School District and the Adventist Virtual Learning Network (AVLN). Offered for credit through Andrews University, Grand Valley State University, and Western Michigan University.
4. For more information on the WebCT Exemplary Course project, visit http://webct.com/exemplary. This course is offered through the Berrien County Intermediate School District and the Adventist Virtual Learning Network (AVLN). Offered for credit through Andrews University, Grand Valley State University, and Western Michigan University.
5. Offered as a partnership between the Berrien County Intermediate School District and Andrews University.
6. Offered through the Adventist Virtual Learning Network (AVLN). Team designed with Shirley Freed and Marilyn Eggers.
7. Offered through the Adventist Virtual Learning Network (AVLN). Team designed with Marilyn Eggers.
8. Offered through the Ameritech Technology Academy grant project in Michigan. Offered for credit through Central Michigan University and Western Michigan University. Team designed with Marilyn Western. To be offered through the Adventist Virtual Learning Network (AVLN) in the summer of 2003.
9. These are actual participant comments from the Week Two required feedback questions.
10. See http://www.avln.org/standards.htm.
11. William Isaacs, Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together (New York: Currency, 1999), p. 9.
12. Ibid. p. 45.
13. If you would like access to view any of these courses, please e-mail me at janine@janinelim.com.
14. A WebQuest is an inquiry-oriented activity in which most or all of the information used by learners is drawn from the Web. See http://webquest.sdsu.edu for more information.
15. See http://www.avln.org/standards.htm.

3 Simple Rules of Facilitating Online Discussion

3 Simple Rules of Facilitating Online Discussion

The role of the instructor in online discussion includes that of a facilitator. The following three basic rules are compiled and adapted from Connected University’s Online Faculty Training course.

  1. In the first week, respond to every participant’s introduction posting and make them feel welcome.
  2. After the initial response to participants, try to respond at least once to each participant every week or so, depending on the size of the class. Note: I’ve tried this, and it started to feel forced. So I went back to my original rule: post when you have of value something to say! See #3.
  3. Instructor posts should deepen the conversation.
    • Validate especially strong points without praising the person.
    • Ask questions. Challenge those on the right track to extend themselves even further.
    • Redirect those participants who aren’t quite hitting the nail on the head to more closely approximate what you’re looking for in their understanding of the concepts involved.

Note: This was first written for the AVLN Active Online Teaching course in 2002.

Creating and Implementing Faculty Online Teaching Standards: Our Journey

This is the USDLA 2014 session that I presented yesterday. I shared our three year journey of merging two universities, revising existing standards, and rebuilding an online course approval process into an online course review process. I told our story – and invited participants to share their stories as well.

I found three points interesting from our conversations:

  1. We are not the only ones creating our own standards, but comparing them to other standard systems to improve, evaluate, and reaffirm our choices. That was interesting and energizing for me to learn.
  2. Participants most appreciated our concept of the 20% survey that just checks how things are going about 3 weeks into a semester long class. We use it as feedback for the instructor, but also for our team to intervene if there are major unreported technical difficulties.
  3. Several people also commented that they appreciated how we are collecting data and making connections (alignment and data collection) between our standards and student evaluations of teaching. No one else in the room was doing that. I want to investigate further what other research is being done on online teaching standards and student evaluations of teaching.

Since we are now reviewing our process, it might be good to present on this topic again next year and share what happened with our revisions.

Blogging USDLA 2014: Accessibility vs. Usability – Designing Beyond the 508 Requirements

I dedicate my blog posts at the USDLA 2014 Conference to Kimberly, the fast runner who let me borrow her Dell power cord!

The first session I attended was on Accessibility, which was presented by someone in place of the main presenter, and I didn’t catch the name.

He shared three myths about accessibility:

  • I can put the video transcript in when a student requests it.
  • Because of ADA I can’t do cool things in my course. He said, almost anything can be made accessible, and anything online is already cool.
  • Captioning video is beyond the financial resources of my school. A librarian in the audience shared how she created videos with the scripts embedded. He shared that at his university the department that does transcripts are two years backlogged. He suggested YouTube and other software programs automatically add captures, but it requires clean-up.

He also shared the main principles of UDL and discussion of how to do that online:

  • Provide multiple means of presentation
    • Including multiple means of navigation
  • Provide multiple means of expression
  • Provide multiple means of engagement (i.e. choice & collaboration)
    • Some asked about choice vs. learning outcomes. He suggested having core objectives that have to be covered, but then to give students choice in the application. I.e. you could have 5 core modules, and then have optional modules where students can choose different tracks, and they can also decide what level / grade to participate.
    • Reflection – expand their metacognitive skills

Finally: Good practices:

  • Check applications end-to-end (including the login page – can they tab between fields)
  • Look at every course with a checklist
  • Involve your disabilities office; hire students with disabilities to test
  • Revise courses every year

Maximizing Reach, Learning and Reflection with Online Learning

GAIN Conference Presentation 2014: Maximizing Reach, Learning and Reflection with Online Learning

What are all the ways you can learn online? Mentoring, blended learning, just-in-time learning, personal learning networks, xMOOCs, cMOOCs, LOOCs, collaborative projects, and more! Come for a fast-paced look at a selection of methods and models for facilitating learning for others or jump-starting your own learning.

Resources and links to explore further:

Presentation PPT

Global Trends and Challenges in Open and Distance Learning

By Paulina Gonzalez-Pose, Chief, Section for Higher Education, UNESCO

It’s Friday morning, the last day of the ICDE World Conference 2013.

What is ODL?

Open learning – a student centered approach to education that removes barriers to access and provides a high degree of autonomy to the learner. Open and distance learning includes the concept of open; as well as distance mediated by technology or print delivery; and could include some face to face time.

Open education includes open educational resources, open access to journals, MOOCs, etc.

UNESCO defines open educational resources as including no licensing and free to use and adapt. OERs have many benefits to an institution.

Global Trends

Global context of decreased public funding for higher ed; increase in demand; increase in student fees; education is less accessible. ODL is seen as a way to meet demand. Higher ed has been seen as for the elite. Globally models of higher education need to shift from models of exclusion to models of inclusion. The modern workplace / knowledge economy requires highly skilled workers; so higher education needs to be more inclusive. ODL is a tool has an emergent possibility of bringing education to populations that have been historically excluded from higher education.

Student expectations are evolving. They want to use power and connected tools to advance their learning. Students are insisting on learning in networked and digital environments.

Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges include:

  • How to improve the quality and quantity of education provided
  • How to create an abundant and skilled workforce qualified to meet the demands in the labor market
  • How to ensure that all segments of society have wide access to quality knowledge and skills
  • How to increase and ensure the possibility of research in small institutions

Why ODL is needed:

  • Free or affordable access
  • Empower learners in fast changing economies
  • Helps meet a massive and growing demand for higher education

Some think that the future is that ODL is a tool that complements and enriches traditional instruction. Others see ODL substitutes traditional face to face teaching methods in a transformative way. We are seeing the lines between online and traditional learning blur – students are mixing. Students in traditional classes engage in online learning – either in activities within a face to face class or by adding online classes to their face to face degree.

ODL has moved into the mainstream – impacting both rich and poor countries. Massive growth around the world. MOOCs are attracting over half of their students from outside North America. Challenges includes persistence, retention, lack of a clear business model, imperfect grading of student work. Students who joined a face to face study group were more likely to complete their MOOC than those who didn’t.

MOOC enrollments compared to ODL institutions: Turkey 1.9 million students in 2012; Open University of China, 3.5 million; etc.

Trends in Africa: African Virtual University; University of South Africa; Zimbabwe Open University; National Open University of Nigeria. Top constraints for using digital technologies for learning: finances, appropriate hardware; bandwidth; electricity, training. Top changes: mobile technologies; social media; increased bandwidth. 1 billion mobile subscribers in Africa by 2015. Who is the most important change agent? Government. These stats are from the eLearning Africa Report; ICWE.

Challenges to be overcome: course design & support; individual teacher & student; organizational, society and cultural context; technology access, cost, design, and localization. In developed countries, the challenges are at the course and individual level; in developing countries, the course, context and technology are the larger challenges. For example, countries where the government won’t hire anyone who has an online degree.

ODL can extend educational opportunities to students in areas of sever need; but unreliable infrastructure and limited access are great barriers. While some ODL providers are excellent, some are not. Quality assurance is need to ensure citizens are not preyed upon by poor quality providers with big marketing budgets.

OER is not yet a dominant model; and they are seldom used in primary and secondary education.

Some suggested strategies:

  • Tailor training and teaching practices to improve relevance to teaching and learning needs in a digital environment.
  • Improve and strengthen accreditation processes for ODFL institutions.
  • Align ODL programs with national needs.
  • Women and students with special needs shouldn’t have barriers to access learning.

Quality includes delivering courses in a method that considers the needs of the learners.

A UNESCO Perspective

Why does UNESCO care? It seeks to help its Members States see how ODL can help countries meet their educational goals.

UNESCO does: publications; conferences (including Mobile Learning Week); UNESCO Chairs Programme – 29 chairs are working on ODL from various countries.

“At no time in history has it been more important to invest in higher education as a major force in building an inclusive and diverse knowledge society and to advance research, innovation and creativity.“ Communique of the 2009 World Conference in Higher Education (UNESCO).

Reflection: This perspective is so different than the U.S. sensational news reporting that Higher Ed is dying and MOOCs will replace bricks and mortar institutions. Instead, ODL is seen as a method to bring education to all people; to care about all types of learners, especially those who struggle to gain access to higher education: women, the poor, the disabled.

Educational Technology in Open and Distance Learning

Still blogging the ICDE 2013 conference. Panel Sessions #2.

Exploration and Practice on Promoting Digital Learning Community Construction Based on Mobile Internet Technology – By Taking “Fujian Lifelong Learning Online” as an Example

By Shen Guanghui, The Open University of Fujian, China

China’s mobile users – about 75%. Fujian Lifelong Learning Online – www.fjrtvu.edu.cn – The platform has unique features: a distributed management system to share resources between the master site and the subsites. Columns can be changed for the users needs. The platform has massive digital learning resources. Every user can also be a provider. They have 40,000 elearning resources for every age group. The platform offers personalized supportive services, including search methods accordingly to curriculum, lecturers, or other features. Their online times are tracked; online counseling is available. It includes intelligent question answering, SNS setting, flexible information managing.

They have targeted 8 cities, 30 counties and 2 villages in the Fujian province. It offers new learning modes and promotes learning organization construction. It provides one-to-one or one-to-many learning. Their audience included the elderly, migrant workers, and community people.

The platform includes ground crew workers’ training, network information security personnel training, primary and middle school teach training, advertising personnel training, with 160,000 enrollments.

A key success factor is the government providing strong digital networks and access throughout the community.

Another strategy shared was to promote online and offline connection through community activities and seminars – to make connections between real and virtual communities.

Access is key to a successful mobile learning strategy. I’ve now heard from China, Korea, and South Africa on mobile learning. The students’ consistent ability to access is key. In China and Korea, partnership with government and/or business was crucial to providing access.

Increasing of Interest to Utilization of the Internet through Online Simulation in the New Student Orientation

By Soleh Hadiryanto, from the Open University in Indonesia

Does the online simulation in the class increase the utilization of the Internet? The study examined the interest of students in using the Internet, using it for learning resources, the barriers the students faced, and what they thought of the online simulation. They looked at the simulation and how it changed the students’ interest in utilizing the Internet as measured with a questionnaire. Interest in using the Internet was moderate before they participated in the online simulation. Their interest definitely increased after they participated in the online simulation; however there were some obstacles in participating in the online simulation.  Recommendations: The instructor should give the opportunity for students to have enough time for the experiment. More computers are needed to for students to participate in the online simulation.

Captioning in Distance Education

By Yoshitomo Yaginuma from The Open University of Japan.

Captioning is important for students with hearing impairments, developmental disabilities, learning disabilities, and for foreign students. Captions are important to exchange TV lecture serious internationally. The Open University of Japan delivers more than 150 TV lectures every year. They are trying to make all of the lectures 100% captioned. In this study, they evaluated a crowd-sourcing captioning system, and created systems to retrieve lecture movies to provide keyword search and associative search. The crowd-sourcing approach shares the work of captioning to the general public. They used the Collaborative Caption Editing System developed by IBM. With crowd-sourcing, the experts in captioning check for quality and make corrections. The system allows the workers to caption without manipulating the video. The crowd sourcing method was faster 8.4  vs. 11.7 (x the original length of the video). SRT is the most popular closed caption format. Speech recognition helped shave off even more time (8.1x the original length of the video).

Caption data can be used as indexes to create effective retrieval methods of the lecture movements. Keyword search is possible as well as associative search (which looks similar to the online thesaurus searching).

A South African Distance Learning Case Study: Reducing Distance Through Mobile Technology

By Patrick Mafenya, from the University of South Africa

This study started because the university was criticized for not using technology to provide access to UNISA through using more technologies. They explored probabilities of reducing transactional distance between students and the institution. Educational technologies have the potential to expand educational opportunities to the marginalized and disadvantaged. 90% of the population in South African uses mobile phones. They used focus groups and individual interviews to collect data from the students. UNISA is a purely distance education university, but they have facilities for students to come and meet with professors face to face as well. Participants were from 5 colleges and were only first year students. Findings of the study included the following themes from the participants perceptions and experiences: limited electrical infrastructure, lack of financial resources, limited bandwidth, inadequate human resource capacity, isolation, and organizational barriers. The university and the government provide learning centers in the rural areas that have the same access as is available in the cities. They still have print based materials to reach the students without Internet access. Reaching the disadvantaged is a reason to explore the use of mobile devices for learning. Cell phones are easy and cheap. Cell phones are used for reminders, reminders of assignments due, etc. They want to grow to using the cell phone as a learning tool as well.

Reflection: With the mobile technology theme, there are definitely clear uses for administrative communication – which helps the students feel connected and cared for. Depending on level of Internet access and the cost of the data plans, the mobile devices could provide access to content and assessments.

The Regulatory Environment and Strategies for Innovative Open and Distance Learning

Parallel Session #1, Subtheme 6: The Regulatory Environment and Strategies for Innovative Open and Distance Learning. ICDE Conference 2013.

Blogging my learning. One sidenote on the format. With English being the second language for so many participants, it was very important to have much of the text written out on the PowerPoint slides so that the audience could follow along.

On How TV University Academic Supervisors Can Inspire Their Students with Innovative Ideology

By Wang Jinpeng, Tianjin Open University, Dongli Branch, China.

Summary: Academic supervisors should teach with our hearts, our love, our wisdom, and our encouragement. The old style of teaching doesn’t meet the needs of the students. Academic supervisors need to provide the students with necessary resources and supports, particularly students who are older and have a heavier burden with living or who travel a long distance to attend classes. More flexible ways can help them finish their academic tasks. Teachers should learn to use computers to communicate with students online. We need to be improving our qualifications and being true friends to the students. Innovative ideology is to be flexible and to try different methods of teaching students.

Management Guidelines for Implementing M-Learning in Distance Education

By Johan Redelinghuys and Hermanus Jacobus van Vuuren.

Interaction and communication between a student and institution regarding administrative and student support are possible via m-learning. Unit for Open Distance Learning at North-West University. 55 centres and programs spread over Southern Africa. There is a library and computer access at each center. Two interactive whiteboards at each centre. Communication and reminders of classes and dates of contact sessions. They are providing learning to teachers, School of Nursing just came on board as well as Theology. They are doing Lecture Capture also and share through a dropbox. Mobile learning started with an SMS session. Administrative or academic questions can be sent to a 5 digit code. They are sending SMSes about when assignments are due. They see m-learning as the middle that connects them and the students. M-learning can add flexibility in dealing with distance learning. Computers are still used, but m-learning is at the intersection of mobile computing and e-learning (MacLean, 2003). Mobile learning allows them to communicate at any time with their institution. One of his study results was that the students wanted the mobile learning used for teaching and learning; but the facilitators weren’t as sure. Text messaging is a preferred method of communication by the students. SNS (social network sites) enable students to connect with each other. They use Facebook for lesson plans, dropbox items, and more. Their students and facilitators need skills training on using the mobile devices so they can interact more. Some of the recommendations:

  • Continuous administration and academic support
  • Improving quality of teaching and learning using midterm communication technologies
  • Increase the available of mobile technologies
  • Assistance to enable the affordability of mobile technologies (cell phone service providers  – at lunch I met Dr. Tae Rim Lee from the Korean Open University and they negotiated with the cell phone providers for unlimited download for their students)
  • Enhancing accessibility to resources for teaching and learning
  • Contributing to the flexibility of the learning
  • Need an affordable method for downloading relevant information
  • Effective academic and administrative support

In this program, they see the students at least 5 times in six months at the various centres.

Reflection: This paper was fascinating to me. The model is a combination of face to face (at centres), online delivery through Facebook and dropbox, and administrative communication through text messaging. The blend of various tools seems to make for an effective delivery system.

Research on Online Learning Diagnosis Based on Data Mining

By Sun Xin, Feng Xia from Renmin University, and the China Data Mining Project.

In this study, she used data mining methods to analyze learners’ behaviors on multiple aspects, and examined the key characteristics of dropouts and low-efficiency and high-efficiency learners. Online learning requires successful learners to have strong self-direction and self-motivation. Data mining can be used to find learners who lag behind.

New ideas in Big Data: Analyze collective data rather than sample data. Seek for efficiency rather than absolute accuracy. Care for the correlation rather than causality. Data mining technology makes use of massive data and predict things by mathematical and statistical algorithms. Statisticians, database administrators, and the [online learning] expert need to work together to make this work.

Their study had all the data recorded in the system since 2001: Registration, admission test, course selection, payment, exam, etc. Students were classified by speed: high efficiency, low efficiency, and ordinary learners. The learning cycle was divided into adaptation period, critical period, and graduation acceleration period. They calculated the probability that learners will become a low-efficiency learner or dropout according to their overall performance. The model measures the learning effect of the learners and judges based on reviewing the behaviors and states of learners in the adaptation period and the critical period respectively.

They have an admissions diagnosis model and an in-progress diagnosis model. They use the data to provide learning diagnosis and analysis of each learning cycle for each learner and learning manager, remind learners to adjust the learning plan, and seek learning guidance.

Reflection: It is interesting to see the various ways that different groups are investigating the data on distance learners to determine what they are doing and how to assist them further.