For the last several months, as I’ve been considering my PhD research, I’ve been wishing that we had a really good descriptive name for what we do – connecting to content providers, guest experts, authors, classroom-to-classroom projects, international cultural exchanges, etc.
Some names we have used are Videoconference Adventures, Electronic Education, Virtual Field Trip, and Expeditions. But these don’t really capture an all inclusive idea of using videoconferencing for curriculum based experiences.
I’ve been guilty of using the term “enrichment” to describe what we do. But enrichment has a connotation of an add-on, an extra. Some thing that is optional. We all know schools who have so thoroughly integrated videoconferencing into the curriculum that whole grade levels annually participate in activities that tightly match their curriculum. So enrichment doesn’t really work either.
So, what do you think of the term “curriculum videoconferencing?” It’s simple and straightforward. The emphasis is on CURRICULUM, right where it should be. It uses the most common term for this technology, videoconferencing. It works to include all the types of K12 videoconferences for the curriculum – authors, content providers, projects, collaborations. We could add K12 in front, but higher ed is dabbling in this use of VC too. Curriculum Videoconferencing. Has a nice ring, doesn’t it?
What do you think? Does it work? Can you think of a better term?
Cool. I’ll add that to my list of synonymies:
I still find it difficult to succinctly define/label what I do when talking about IVC. Saying that I work in television is brief enough for most folks, but doesn’t really capture the dynamics.
BTW, there is not preview option, so I hope my HTML coding works on this post.
Jason, when you write, “I still find it difficult to succinctly define/label what I do when talking about IVC. Saying that I work in television is brief enough for most folks, but doesn’t really capture the dynamics” that captures the essence that we all feel.
We know what we do and we know quality when we see and experience it, but how do we explain that to someone not in our field?
In our area, we defined what we do as “videoconferencing” but I agree that a term that we can begin to use within our community of practice to communicate the relevance to the curriculum and nature of the technology would be helpful. We have worked diligently to provide quality projects, recommend quality providers, and excellent support to create positive experiences for our teachers and students.
Janine, I think this is a great idea to find a succinct way to share this with curriculum directors and administrators
[…] am an advocate for curriculum videoconferencing. I talk to the teachers and know the power of the connection. I get that it can improve student […]
[…] We finished our Bluebonnet Conference the week before Thanksgiving and I was amazed at the quality of the student presentations. Here is a quick recap of the 20 presentations. These are great examples of “curriculum videoconferencing“. […]