For the past several years, I’ve been using a slide with the continuum of videoconferencing technology in my workshops. I decided it’s time to write up my thoughts about this so we can all refer others to the choices for videoconferencing. This post was co-written with guest blogger Lori Colwill.
The continuum starts at the lowest level and moves up from there.
Desktop VC: Skype, iChat, etc.
- Proprietary (i.e. Skype only connects to Skype, iChat only connects to iChat, etc).
- Disadvantage: Lack of echo-cancellation or stability of the call can make it difficult to use with a classroom of students
- Disadvantage: Some security concerns for classroom use
- Disadvantage: Lower quality and inability to connect to most content providers
- Options: Skype, iChat, GoogleTalk, TokBox, TinyChat, FaceTime and others
Desktop VC: Open Source H.323
H323 is the standard for what is also referred to as IP based videoconferencing. With H323 you can connect to any other H323 device (in theory).
- Ekiga and XMeeting
- Connects to most H323 standard videoconferencing units
- Disadvantage: No echo-cancellation can make it difficult to use with a classroom of students
Desktop VC: H.323
- LifeSize Desktop: software only; no server required (8/12/09: It’s SIP only; not H323) (3/4/11: If it’s installed with a server and bridge, you can connect to H.323)
- Polycom PVX software: $120 ish plus webcam
- Polycom CMA: desktop software that requires a server
- Tandberg Movi: desktop software that requires a server
- Echo-cancellation may be a problem
- Rigging audio and video from a desktop system to work in a classroom can be challenging
Small Room Systems: Fixed Camera H.323
- Under $5000
- Polycom V500, VSX 5000
- LifeSize Express w/Focus camera
- Cameras have limited or no movement
- Designed for small conference rooms, 3-7 people
- Easy to receive content from content providers etc., but difficult to use to have students present for events like Read Around the Planet and other collaborative projects
Classroom Systems: H.323 SD
- SD is standard definition
- Range from $3000-$9000
- Ask your vendor for an “entry level” unit
- As of summer ’09 most of the schools and content providers I connect with have this level
- The older units are “set top” units that were designed to sit on a TV; newer units separate camera & codec to accommodate flat screen monitors
- Ability to connect a computer and document camera for presenting
- Great camera movement, ideal for classrooms
- Polycom VSX 7000 and 8000 series (older)
- Polycom QDX (newer, faster, better, cheaper)
- Tandberg 770, 880, 990 MXPs (older)
Classroom Systems: H.323 HD
- HD: High definition.
- To take full advantage of HD, calls need to be at 1-4 M. Most schools don’t have that bandwidth available; most content providers still make calls at 384K.
- It’s an investment in the future of the technology. In theory, soon we’ll all have the bandwidth to upgrade to HD.
- Lifesize Express, Express 200, Team MP, Team 200, Room, and Room 200
- Polycom HDX 7000, 8000 9000 series
- Tandberg QuickSet C20 (newer, entry level HD unit)
- Tandberg Edge MXPs 75, 85, 95
Carts vs. Rooms
A few words about installing a “cart” vs. installing a “room”.
- A cart installation is usually a classroom system (see above)
- plus a monitor (or a projector i.e. Tandberg Media Place)
- installed on a cart
- with one microphone on a 30 foot cord that can be moved around the classroom easily as needed.
- A simple remote can be easily learned by the videoconference coordinator.
- It might include a document camera and a way to connect a computer.
- A cart installation is usually under $10K.
- A integrated room installation is often a classroom system
- plus two to four monitors
- with a presentation stand for teaching over videoconferencing
- plus ceiling and/or desk microphones
- plus a fancy lots of buttons touch panel for controlling the system (usually AMX or Creston)
- plus lots of peripherals: computer, document camera, extra inputs, DVD/VCR
Classroom teachers are intimidated by room installations! So are students. The cart is much simpler and easier if you plan to use VC for curriculum videoconferencing. The room may be better for full length courses.
- really fancy expensive executive meeting systems designed to make you feel like you’re in the same room
- includes special paint and lighting
- can’t see them used in schools anytime soon, but this is why you want to expose your students to VC – they will use it in their business work
Videoconference Network Infrastructure
If you are part of a videoconference network (through your state, region, or large school district), you may learn about videoconference network infrastructure.
- MCUs: Bridges which allow multiple participants in multiple conferences at the same time
- IP VCRs: Allows for recording and streaming of videoconference content
- Firewall transversal units: Used to solve the challenges of H323 through your firewall (only get this if you can’t make it work any other way in my opinion)
- Gateways for IP to ISDN, H.323 to voice, H.323 to SIP and H.323 to proprietary protocols (Thx Craig!)
- Gatekeepers: for dialing plans
- Management software: for places that manage many units: for scheduling, upgrading software, providing directory services, etc.
Now that you see the big picture, what should you do? If at all possible, try for an entry-level unit or classroom H323 unit. Talk to your school district or regional tech and see what the plan for videocoferencing is for your area. You may have access to VC and not even know it!
Comments, thoughts? Favorite VC vendor missing? Please comment, share and add to our knowledge!
Revision 8/6/09 with LifeSize based on comments below.
4/9/10 Addition: You may also be interested in the VC Continuum in My Schools
No LifeSize mentioned at all? We have some schools using them.
Do you know where they should go?
LifeSize used to position themselves as HD VTC. They were the precursor to Telepresence. Since everyone else has caught up, I’d put them in “Classroom Systems: H.323 HD”
On the cart model, some schools just hook the vc unit into a projector. Tandberg has a MediaPlace
That is a bit different than with the monitor(s).
LifeSize actually just came out with a new Desktop product as well. http://www.lifesize.com/products/lifesize_desktop/
Thanks for adding everyone!
I was coming over here to add the LifeSize desktop product. We are about to move to 64bit machines and I was glad to see their product was compatible, except it lists 64-bit Vista. Our machines will run Windows 7.
am checking on Polycom PVX also, b/c we have to keep Shane singing with kids! 😉
The LifeSize Express w/Focus camera fits in the ‘Small Room Systems: Fixed Camera H.323’ category as it is under $5000 but it also supports HD. The LifeSize systems that go in the ‘Classroom Systems: H.323 HD’ category include the Express, Express 200, Team MP, Team 200, Room, and Room 200. The LifeSize systems that go in the ‘Desktop VC: H.323’ category include LifeSize Multipoint Extension and LifeSize Desktop and both are HD capable as well.
thanks everyone again! I’ve updated with the info you shared…
When video conferencing is part of a classroom, it is no longer defined by walls and desks. It enables teachers and students to share lectures, ideas and experiences ultimately expanding the world of learning to anywhere. Below is a cool video from Dr. Lance Ford of TANDBERG with his perspective on how video can make a difference in every student’s life.
Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZt3_f6N2vk&feature=channel_page
Thanks for the comment & link, Lara. Do you think the cost of VC will come down far enough anytime soon so that every classroom could have VC? Just curious what you think….
Good question. Absolutely, we believe you will see a proliferation of distance learning deployment at the classroom in the near future.
The cost of video codecs is certainly coming down to an affordable level, but the need to add additional peripherals drives the cost back up. As a result, most schools resort to purchasing a distance learning system that acts as a shared resource – think of the old overhead projector that you checked out of the library. So price often limits the numbers of video systems available in a school or district, but then the fact that the system is a “shared” resource keeps teachers from making video a part of their day to day instruction.
State, Federal and Foundation grants of all shapes and sizes are available to schools across the country, both public and private. Stimulus dollars targeted at educational technology, assistive technology, and transformational education are available through formula and discretionary grants. The trick is to understand first what you want to accomplish, and then to find a grant that’s a good fit. Don’t try to fit a square peg into a round hole! It’s important to focus on grants that truly mirror your objectives and the demographics of your project area. TANDBERG has a team of grant specialists that can help you identify those programs, and provide guidance and assistance as you explore the application process. Hundreds of schools across the country have used grants as a way to bring video technologies into the classroom. And certainly that addresses the issue of affordability!
“Gateways for IP to ISDN: Rarely necessary anymore”
Gateways can be used for H.323 to voice, H.323 to SIP and H.323 to proprietary protocols. I think we’ll have gateways for a while yet. 🙂
Thanks Craig – I’ll update the wording! 🙂
[…] open to K12 schools with access to IP or ISDN videoconferencing (H.323 or […]
[…] remains free thanks to sponsorship from Polycom. You do not even need TWICE membership! Anyone with standards-based (H.323) videoconferencing can […]
Under the Desktop Solutions, I see you have the LifeSize option crossed out. LifeSize used to be partners with Radvision, now makers of SCOPIA Desktop. LifeSize and Radvision split recently, but we purchased Radvision’s SCOPIA Desktop, server and MCU with our LifeSize implementation. It is really a great solution, and cross-platform. It does require a server with which are included a number of “Pro” licenses. A person with a Pro license controls their virtual meeting room, but others can join with a free download of the SCOPIA Desktop browser plug-in.
Hi Linda – thanks for adding this. We did find that on its own, it doesn’t connect H.323; only SIP. But it sounds like it works fine if you have the bridge as part of the implementation as well. Does that sound right?
I can easily invite H.323 endpoints of any type into my meeting, but that may be because of our server solution as you indicate. I’ve never tried it any other way.
Yes, that sounds right. When we tested in 2009, we tried dialing direct without going through meeting room. The bridge is what allows the different standards to connect to each other.
As per the suggestion, I will try for an entry-level unit or classroom H323 unit.
I hope I can try this in the classroom.
Skype is a great option
I will try for an entry-level unit or classroom H323 unit.
I believe that skype is a great option for us to use for video conferencing, even google hangouts for that matter.
We just had a PD of a man using VC with a cafeteria full of teachers and it worked great.
Our district just did a VC for PD and it was very interesting. It was my first encounter with VC and I was pleased with the result. I’m thinking I should start out with something quite small when first beginning.
Since i am very new to VC, i would like to begin with the programs i am knowledgeable with, such as skype.
Gina Willmon says: I have not seen VC in our district. I am hoping to see VC in our district in the near future.
We had access to the Classroom System that can be used with a flat screen in our library for the students to conference with other schools.
i have npot had the opportunity to vc in the classroom nor have i heard of it being done in our district as of yet. I would like to experience it soon or hear of it in our district soon
I also have not seen it used in my isd. But I do understand we have that capability. I believe that it could be a lot of fun to do a virtual tour of a museum or a ceramic workshop.
I have not seen this used in our district. I am guessing the cost is prohibitative at this time.
I will try for an entry level unit
We have used Skype and Google. Its nice to check them both when one wont work try the other.
I have not seen VC in our district but will be inquiring more and pushing for it if we don’t have it.
I believe that Skype is a good option, however Skype can experience very bad connection problems and issues with screen quality. This could lose student attention.
January 6, 2017
I have used SKYPE at home and in the classroom. I like that it is something I am comfortable with using. I would like to try some other sources.
I have not heard of VC being done in our district as of yet. I think it would be a very neat thing for our teachers to experience with students. I hope it will
be used in our district one day.
I love VC. I do a lot of my personal classes via VC.
I found out that the district has a lot of equipment all we have to do is ask for it. If we do not then we have resources, like grants that can be use to buy things to use for out class rooms.
I have used Skype in my classroom with 2nd graders. I choose another teacher at another campus and I’m cautious when going beyond that.
I have used skype and love the idea of VC. It will effective if it meets the needs of your students and your lesson and reliable .
I am not aware of what all we have to offer Yet!
I think skype is the best option for me as I know how to use it! Also, I know a few people off the top of my head in certain professions that my students could skype with.
I was not aware of all the VC we have at all I normally just use facetime to talk to my husband and child. I would probably use skype since that seems to be more popular I could ask one of my friends for help i’m sure.
I see this being helpful to home bound students so they can still interact with others.
Great tool to use for home bound kids to include them in the learning with others.
Skype and Facetime are the two that I am most familiar with.
Nepris or Connect2Texas
facetime and skype are two that I know of that I have used.
I have only ever used facetime or skype. I can’t wait to dig into some of the others.
I used Skype.
I would be interested in using Google Hangouts in my classroom
I have not used any of these in my classroom. I am about to begin using google classroom with my students.
Some of the other teachers have been using similar type avenues. I will consult my tech specialist for more details and training.
I’m not sure what all my district has to offer.
I will be sure to check with our on campus computer tech to ask many of these questions.
[…] Read more here: The Continuum of Videoconferencing […]
We have laptops and ipads available that we could connect to our boards in class to allow for more interaction.
there many students that use Facetime.whatsup skype and others for interaction with peers